Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
Side-by-Side Comparison

Castle Connolly vs Healthgrades: Side-by-Side Comparison

Castle Connolly is a curated physician recognition program that nominates and selects "Top Doctors" based on peer nominations and a credentialing review process. Healthgrades is a consumer-facing platform with ~3M+ provider profiles and patient-submitted reviews. They represent two different philosophies for physician quality signaling: expert curation vs. patient volume.

Dimension by dimension

Castle Connolly vs Healthgrades, across 8 dimensions

DimensionCastle ConnollyHealthgrades
Data typePeer-nominated physician recognition — "Top Doctors" selected by credentialing review and peer surveyConsumer patient reviews + provider-submitted profiles + state licensing data
Coverage~10,000 Top Doctors annually (per Castle Connolly); highly selective~3 million+ provider profiles
Refresh cadenceAnnual nomination and review cycle— (not publicly disclosed)
License / CostFree for consumers to search; printed directory and licensing — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider marketing packages — pricing not public
API accessNo public APINo public API
Source provenancePeer nomination + credentialing staff review; selection criteria published at a high level but not field-level auditablePatient-submitted reviews + state licensing; field-level provenance not documented
Primary use casePremium physician discovery for patients seeking peer-recognized specialists; press and consumer recognition for physiciansBroad physician discovery, review reading, insurance-network filtering
PricingFree consumer search; directory and media licensing — pricing not publicFree for patients; provider packages — pricing not public

Cells marked “—” indicate values not publicly documented by the respective platform. No data has been estimated or fabricated.

Honest fit

Which platform fits your team

When to use Castle Connolly

Use Castle Connolly when the audience needs a curated shortlist of peer-recognized specialists — particularly for complex or elective procedures where patients are willing to travel for a recognized expert. The list is selective and signals peer regard rather than patient volume.

https://www.castleconnolly.com →

When to use Healthgrades

Use Healthgrades for broad provider discovery across any specialty, geography, and insurance network. Its review volume and insurance filters make it the practical starting point for most patient searches, even if it lacks peer-nominated selectivity.

https://www.healthgrades.com →

FAQ

Common questions

Is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor designation officially recognized?
Castle Connolly is a private company — its Top Doctor designation is a recognition program, not a regulatory credential. It is peer-influenced and carries brand recognition in physician circles, but it is not issued by a medical board, CMS, or any government agency. For regulated credentials, state medical board licensure and ABMS board certification are the authoritative sources.
How does Castle Connolly select Top Doctors?
Castle Connolly uses a peer nomination process — physicians nominate colleagues — followed by a credentialing review by Castle Connolly's staff. The selection criteria are published at a high level on their website, but the per-nomination decision process is not publicly auditable.
Can Castle Connolly or Healthgrades data be used in a credentialing application?
Neither is a credentialing source for regulatory or billing purposes. For credentialing, the authoritative sources are state medical board licensure (varies by state) and Medicare enrollment status via CMS PECOS. OIG LEIE provides the federal exclusion check. These are the federal primary sources for any compliance-grade credentialing workflow.
Does being on Healthgrades guarantee a physician is in good standing?
No. Healthgrades is a listing and review platform, not a licensure authority. A provider can appear on Healthgrades while under disciplinary action or with a lapsed license. State medical boards and CMS PECOS enrollment status are the authoritative sources for good-standing determination.

Last updated 2026-05-31. See all comparisons at /compare →

READY TO SHIP

Add federal-data citations to your agent in 60 seconds.

Drop our MCP server into Claude Desktop or call the API with pk_dx_sample. No signup. No credit card. Live demo key.

Add Fonteum to your agent →Request pilot access

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
12.5Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
4.7Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
33dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
47reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures